Daily fraud update: 15th June

UK court dismisses case over Ikon and Hantec

A judge in the UK has announced that a lawsuit against two foreign exchange firms has been kicked out of court.

The breach of contract lawsuits brought against the two brokers, Ikon Finance and Hantec Markets, will now no longer be heard in the High Court after a judge removed the case.

The case centres on the story of Hafez Fakhri Taji Al Farouqi, a resident of Jordan.

Al Farouqi said that Ikon moved across his account to Hantec without asking for his permission during a tumultuous period for Ikon in which it was in the crosshairs of a British regulator.

As a result, he claimed, he was entitled to misappropriated funds and damages reaching almost $11.6m.

He also claimed that he was entitled to $42m in civil damages.

In addition to the unauthorised switch claim, Al Farouqi also said that he believed that the brokers were taking commission and introduction fees from his account – without permission, and in secret.

He also accused Hantec of shutting down his foreign exchange account and also failing to send the proper terms of cancellation or providing a reasonable notice period.

Ikon, which like Hantec is a broker, did leave the retail foreign exchange market back in 2017.

This happened after the British regulator the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) placed restrictions on it.

The FCA claimed that Ikon did not have proper operational plans up and running.

Hantec acquired the clients of Ikon after this happened.

The case hit the courts in the UK last December.

At the time, Hantec decided to respond sternly to all of the allegations and claimed that the allegations were wrong.

It defended itself by saying that there was no obligation on the firm to tell Al Farouqi why it shut down his account or any obligation to continue to permit him to have an account more generally.

It claimed that it provided a notice period of nine days prior to shutting down Al Farouqi’s account.

It also said that Al Farouqi had not had to experience any losses as a result.

It went on to outline its claims that it had in fact not charged commission on any of Al Farouqi’s accounts.

It also pointed out that Al Farouqi had agreed to the process of switching over the accounts by clicking and ticking a box in order to agree to the broker’s terms and conditions.

As the case came to court, Al Farouqi said that even this nine-day period was not satisfactory or an example of good practice.

He claimed that it failed to offer him an opportunity to get back to the broker with more information in the event that there had been a misunderstanding.

However, with the investigation now over, the judge in the case, Amanda Tipples, dismissed the claims against both Ikon and Hantec.

Tipples even described the claims that they had created fake trades in order to cause Al Farouqi to lose money as “fanciful”.

Forex Fraud Analyst Team

Share

Tweet

Safest Forex Brokers 2023

	Broker	Info	Best In	Customer Satisfaction Score
#1	Your capital is at risk Founded: 2006	Globally regulated broker	BEST CUSTOMER SUPPORT Visit broker	4.9
#2	Your capital is at risk Founded: 2014	Global Forex Broker	BEST SPREADS Visit broker	4.8
#3	73 % of retail CFD accounts lose money Founded: 2014	Global Forex & CFD Broker	Best Trading Conditions Visit broker	4.9
#4	67% of CFD traders lose Founded: 2007	Global CFD & FX Broker	ALL-INCLUSIVE TRADING PLATFORM Visit broker	4.9
#5	79 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Founded: 2008	Global CFD Provider	Best Trading App Visit broker	5

Forex Fraud Certified Brokers