US Congressman weighs in on cryptocurrency market debate

A leading US Congressman with a specific interest in the operation of cryptocurrencies has once again weighed in on the topic.

Representative Darren Soto, who represents the 9^th district of Florida, has been a leading proponent of having cryptocurrencies classified as commodities – and therefore having them covered by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

This is as opposed to the alternative, which would be classifying them as securities and having them regulated by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC).

In his most recent statement on the matter, Soto – a member of the Democratic Party – said again that he believed the SEC wouldn’t be an appropriate body for the task.

That, he claims, is because the SEC is particularly heavy-handed when it comes to regulation and that a “lighter touch” institution, such as the CFTC, is more appropriate.

“Those are agencies with a lighter touch and we have grown consensus among the industry that they’d be appropriate for the majority of these types of cryptocurrency transactions and the nature of these assets”, he said.

Soto is considered to be a leading lawmaker in the field of cryptocurrencies.

Last month, for example, he co-sponsored a pair of bills in the US House of Representatives which covered the topic. He co-sponsored them alongside Representative Warren Davidson, a Republican representing the 8^th district of Ohio.

The first of the two bills was the Virtual Currency Consumer Protection Act of 2018, which proposed to give the CFTC a clear role. Under the bill, the CFTC would become responsible for creating possible regulations within the cryptocurrencies market – a move which could, in theory, reduce crypto fraud in the long term.

If made into law, it would also give the CFTC the right to investigate issues of manipulated prices.

The other bill, called the US Virtual Currency Market and Regulatory Competitiveness Act, sought to improve the amount of policy research which takes place around the crypto market.

Despite the additional burdens it can sometimes place on companies in the crypto field, cryptocurrency regulation is seen as a good move by many crypto firms. This is because countries which have already grappled with the regulation issue are seen as less likely to suddenly introduce negative laws on the crypto issue and are therefore seen as less volatile places in which to conduct crypto-related business.

Countries such as Japan, which have established crypto regulation systems, also manage to enjoy successful crypto industries.

Whether or not the SEC decides to accept the definition proposed by Soto, however, is another matter.

Last year, SEC Chair Jay Clayton said that he didn’t agree with redefining what “security” means in order to accommodate cryptocurrencies.

“We are not going to do any violence to the traditional definition of a security that has worked for a long time”, he said.

“There’s no need to change the definition. A token, a digital asset, where I give you my money and you go off and make a venture, and in return for giving you my money I say ‘you can get a return’…that is a security and we can regulate that. We regulate the offering of that security and regulate the trading of that security”, he added.

About the author: Harvey Johnson

Harvey is our resident cryptocurrency expert and is on a mission to know everything about Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Montero, Ripple and whatever else this emerging and evolving industry can come up with. He is at his happiest when rooting out new digital trends and gets a genuine thrill out of anticipating what new fraud opportunities they may bring and how best to counteract them. Harvey describes the internet as not only a space in which fraudsters can operate but also the best tool with which to combat fraud, with its ability to facilitate sound research, disseminate genuine advice and make reliable information as accessible as possible. Harvey cites the film The Matrix as the spark that ignited his interest in this field, and he has an encyclopaedic knowledge of classic cinema to rival his cryptocurrency pedigree. He holds an MPS in Cyber Policy and Risk Analysis and is passionate about sharing his expertise with others, having begun his writing career on a dizzying array of online forums before joining ForexFraud.com. In his spare time Harvey enjoys coding his own computer games and training for long distance runs. If he’s not at his computer you may find him running up and down San Francisco’s famous Lyon Street Steps or at the Kezar Stadium, forever trying to set a new personal best.

Share

Tweet

Safest Forest Brokers 2020

	Broker	Info	Best In	Customer Satisfaction Score
#1	Your capital is at risk Founded: 2011	Global CFD & FX Broker	BEST FOREX BROKER Visit broker	5
#2	CFDs and FX are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Founded: 2010	Global Forex Broker	Low minimum deposit Visit broker	4.9
#3	Your capital is at risk Founded: 2014	Global Forex & CFD Broker	Best Trading Conditions Visit broker	4.9
#4	Your capital is at risk Founded: 2014	Global Forex Broker	BEST SPREADS Visit broker	4.8
#5	80.5% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Founded: 2008	Global CFD Broker	Best Trading App Visit broker	5

Forex Fraud Certified Brokers