SEC Commissioner weighs in on cryptocurrencies regulation

A leading member of a US regulatory commission has shared her views on how the crypto regulatory framework in the US should operate.

Hester Peirce, a Commissioner at the Securities and Exchange Commission, said in a speech that “entrepreneurship and innovation do not have the happiest of relationships with regulation” – and claimed that describing blockchain as a totally decentralised system was perhaps too simplistic.

Speaking at the Protecting the Public While Fostering Innovation and Entrepreneurship: First Principles for Optimal Regulation event at the University of Missouri School of Law, Peirce openly admitted that the SEC found it difficult to regulate crypto effectively.

“This area has challenged many regulators around the world, and the SEC is certainly no exception. We, along with other regulators, are asking how existing rules apply in this space and whether a new regulatory framework would work better”, she said.

“If we act appropriately, we can enable innovation on this new frontier to proceed without compromising the objectives of our securities laws—protecting investors, facilitating capital formation, and ensuring fair, orderly, and efficient markets”, she added.

The SEC has had a complicated relationship with crypto over the years.

Earlier this month, for example, a report from the SEC said that it would keep a close eye on cryptocurrency providers to ensure that investors were remaining protected.

It is still believed to be searching for ways to define as accurately as possible which assets are, technically, securities.

In her wide-ranging speech, Peirce attempted to engage with these questions by touching on the essential nature of blockchain systems, and how they are both similar and different to other major modes of economic activity.

Decentralisation, she argued, was a clear part of the traditional economy too – and quoted Bitcoin’s founder, Satoshi Nakamoto, in her speech.

“Blockchain-based networks offer a new way of coordinating human action that does not fit as neatly within our securities framework”, she said.

“Satoshi Nakamoto, in the white paper that introduced bitcoin to the world, envisioned a “network [that] is robust in its unstructured simplicity.” Uncoordinated nodes work together toward a common end “with little coordination”.

For Peirce, one of the most crucial parts of the blockchain regulation project was that the existence of ICOs, or initial coin offerings, demonstrated that sometimes centralisation did exist in blockchain.

She also referenced the Howey test, an old-fashioned method of determining what is and isn’t security, which is now often used in crypto regulation.

“As Director Hinman [the SEC’s Director of Corporation Finance] noted in his speech, it is the nature of the transaction that determines whether an offering of securities has occurred, not the item being sold.

“The oranges in Howey were not securities standing on their own, nor were the groves in which they grew. By contrast, the overall package sold to investors—the ‘opportunity to contribute money and to share in the profits of a large citrus fruit enterprise managed and partly owned by [third parties]’—was a securities offering and therefore triggered federal securities law” she said.

About the author: Harvey Johnson

Harvey is our resident cryptocurrency expert and is on a mission to know everything about Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Montero, Ripple and whatever else this emerging and evolving industry can come up with. He is at his happiest when rooting out new digital trends and gets a genuine thrill out of anticipating what new fraud opportunities they may bring and how best to counteract them. Harvey describes the internet as not only a space in which fraudsters can operate but also the best tool with which to combat fraud, with its ability to facilitate sound research, disseminate genuine advice and make reliable information as accessible as possible. Harvey cites the film The Matrix as the spark that ignited his interest in this field, and he has an encyclopaedic knowledge of classic cinema to rival his cryptocurrency pedigree. He holds an MPS in Cyber Policy and Risk Analysis and is passionate about sharing his expertise with others, having begun his writing career on a dizzying array of online forums before joining ForexFraud.com. In his spare time Harvey enjoys coding his own computer games and training for long distance runs. If he’s not at his computer you may find him running up and down San Francisco’s famous Lyon Street Steps or at the Kezar Stadium, forever trying to set a new personal best.

Share

Tweet

Safest Forest Brokers 2020

	Broker	Info	Best In	Customer Satisfaction Score
#1	Your capital is at risk Founded: 2011	Global CFD & FX Broker	BEST FOREX BROKER Visit broker	5
#2	CFDs and FX are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Founded: 2010	Global Forex Broker	Low minimum deposit Visit broker	4.9
#3	Your capital is at risk Founded: 2014	Global Forex & CFD Broker	Best Trading Conditions Visit broker	4.9
#4	Your capital is at risk Founded: 2006	Globally regulated broker	BEST CUSTOMER SUPPORT Visit broker	4.9
#5	Your capital is at risk Founded: 2014	Global Forex Broker	BEST SPREADS Visit broker	4.8

Forex Fraud Certified Brokers